Video · Waterloo · Lexington Public School

Approved in 2010.Still not built.

In 2010 our board approved a 13-classroom addition for Lexington Public School in Waterloo. The province never funded it. In 2024–25 the school had 355 students and permanent places for 113, the highest rate in the board.

The written version

The board said yes. The province said no.

What I said outside Lexington, in writing, with a source for every number. The charts below show it.

Lexington Public School is in our ward, on Forestlawn Road in Waterloo. In 2024–⁠25 it had 355 students.⁠[1] Its permanent building has places for 113.⁠[2] That’s about 314% of its permanent capacity, the highest rate in our public board.

Permanent capacity doesn’t count portables or portapaks.⁠[2] Lexington’s students do have classrooms, and published class sizes averaged 23.6 in 2024–⁠25.⁠[7] But most of them depend on space the board itself calls temporary: “a 12-room portapak,” and a gymnasium structure that “is not permanent.”⁠[2]

On the latest province-wide data, from 2020–⁠21, Lexington ranked eighth of 4,790 Ontario schools on students against permanent capacity.⁠[3] In our own board, nothing is close. Of the 120 schools with a published capacity, the next highest is at 150%.⁠[1]⁠[2]

A board can plan an addition. It can’t pay for one. Queen’s Park funds school construction and sets the requirements a project has to meet.⁠[12] In 2010 our board approved a 13-classroom addition for Lexington, to open in September 2012 if the province funded it.⁠[4]⁠[5] In January 2013 the province announced its funding, and the addition wasn’t on the list. A separate three-room kindergarten addition went ahead.⁠[5] The 13 classrooms never did.

Children in senior kindergarten at Lexington in 2013–⁠14, the first year of the full-day kindergarten program those new rooms were built for, finished Grade 12 this past June.⁠[5]

For the last four funding rounds, the question never reached the province. Each time, board staff screened a Lexington rebuild out before submission with the same line: “Does not meet criteria; ineligible project.”⁠[9]⁠[10]⁠[11]⁠[12] Other rows on those lists give a reason, like “premature due to timing.” Lexington’s row, like a few others, never says which requirement it fails.⁠[12]

I can’t fund a school. No trustee can. A trustee can move motions, ask for reports and vote in public. I’d move for a public decision on submitting Lexington in the next round, with a report on what it needs to qualify. I’d move to publish every capital request, every screening reason and every vote. Parents deserve to see what we’re asking for and what’s standing in the way.

Make no mistake: Queen’s Park needs to step up here.

So far ahead

One school, out on its own.

“It’s ridiculous to see this on a chart,” I said in the video. This is the chart: every school in our board with a published capacity.

120 schools. One is not like the others.

Each square is one school, placed by its 2024–25 students as a share of its permanent places. 119 schools fall between 53% and 150%. Lexington is at 314%, more than double the next school.

  • A school in the board
  • Lexington PS

Source: Ontario Ministry of Education enrolment, October 31, 2024 headcount,⁠[1] over on-the-ground capacity in the board’s 2020–2030 plan, which excludes portables and portapaks.⁠[2] 75 of the other schools are at or under 100%. Oak Creek PS and Willow River PS have no published capacity and are left out. Laurelwood PS includes its recent addition.

Show all 120 schools as a table
WRDSB schools by students as a share of permanent places, 2024–25
SchoolCityStudentsPermanent placesShare
Lexington PSWaterloo355113314%
Lackner Woods PSKitchener620412150%
Westheights PSKitchener480320150%
Chalmers Street PSCambridge385257150%
Blair Road PSCambridge405271149%
Groh PSKitchener885597148%
Winston Churchill PSWaterloo320216148%
Centennial (Waterloo) PSWaterloo415294141%
Pioneer Park PSKitchener410294139%
Parkway PSCambridge350251139%
Elmira DSSElmira1,305975134%
Doon PSKitchener435331131%
Grandview PSNew Hamburg230179128%
Laurelwood PSWaterloo705550128%
Chicopee Hills PSKitchener795623128%
Country Hills PSKitchener390309126%
Waterloo-Oxford DSSBaden1,4601,164125%
Keatsway PSWaterloo365294124%
MacGregor PSWaterloo510414123%
Waterloo CIWaterloo1,4801,203123%
Clemens Mill PSCambridge640527121%
Forest Heights CIKitchener1,5551,281121%
Forest Glen PSNew Hamburg540446121%
Vista Hills PSWaterloo775643121%
Huron Heights SSKitchener1,4551,224119%
Elizabeth Ziegler PSWaterloo510437117%
Ayr PSAyr205179115%
Laurel Heights SSWaterloo1,7651,548114%
Kitchener Waterloo C & VSKitchener1,6501,461113%
John Mahood PSElmira430381113%
Grand River CIKitchener1,5601,383113%
Empire PSWaterloo490441111%
Cameron Heights CIKitchener1,7651,596111%
Brigadoon PSKitchener545495110%
Moffat Creek PSCambridge705642110%
Janet Metcalfe PSKitchener720657110%
King Edward PSKitchener380352108%
Silverheights PSCambridge685637108%
Cedar Creek PSAyr565527107%
Avenue Road PSCambridge495464107%
Mackenzie King PSKitchener380363105%
Preston PSCambridge315303104%
Driftwood Park PSKitchener365352104%
Eastwood CIKitchener1,2701,230103%
Wilson Avenue PSKitchener515510101%
Stewart Avenue PSCambridge51051399%
Elgin Street PSCambridge42043098%
Westmount PSKitchener48049397%
Westvale PSWaterloo39040197%
Alpine PSKitchener28529497%
Lincoln Heights PSWaterloo45046796%
Hespeler PSCambridge65067596%
Tait Street PSCambridge46550792%
Highland PSCambridge42546492%
Suddaby PSKitchener50555291%
Lester B. Pearson PSWaterloo59565491%
Jean Steckle PSKitchener65071591%
Sandhills PSKitchener61567891%
Glencairn PSKitchener29533289%
Wellesley PSWellesley63071488%
J F Carmichael PSKitchener48555288%
Sir Adam Beck PSBaden49556588%
Hillcrest PSCambridge37042687%
Franklin PSKitchener55063487%
Breslau PSBreslau49056587%
Mary Johnston PSWaterloo37543387%
Saginaw PSCambridge39545886%
St Jacobs PSSt Jacobs27532086%
Queensmount PSKitchener37043286%
Laurentian PSKitchener36042186%
Sheppard PSKitchener36543384%
N A MacEachern PSWaterloo26030984%
Central PSCambridge25530883%
Meadowlane PSKitchener23528582%
W.T. Townshend PSKitchener62575882%
Jacob Hespeler SSCambridge1,0701,29982%
Galt C & VICambridge9601,16782%
Trillium PSKitchener21526282%
Glenview Park SSCambridge1,0551,28782%
Williamsburg PSKitchener63077082%
William G Davis PSCambridge37045581%
Abraham Erb PSWaterloo39548781%
Riverside PSElmira45055781%
Bluevale CIWaterloo1,1151,38980%
Edna Staebler PSWaterloo57572080%
Manchester PSCambridge34042680%
Stanley Park PSKitchener37046480%
Courtland Avenue PSKitchener27034079%
Park Manor PSElmira21527179%
Crestview PSKitchener41552579%
St Andrew's PSCambridge33542479%
Conestogo PSConestogo20526278%
J W Gerth PSKitchener45558278%
Woodland Park PSCambridge37047977%
Southwood SSCambridge70091277%
Southridge PSKitchener39551876%
Coronation PSCambridge32543275%
Baden PSBaden45560575%
Preston HSCambridge8551,13775%
Rockway PSKitchener22029475%
Blue Heron PSCambridge40053675%
Queen Elizabeth PSKitchener26535874%
Centennial (Cambridge) PSCambridge21529473%
New Dundee PSNew Dundee16522872%
Forest Hill PSKitchener40556072%
Smithson PSKitchener27037672%
Grand View PSCambridge25034972%
Linwood PSLinwood36052868%
Sunnyside PSKitchener31045568%
Northlake Woods PSWaterloo34051067%
Margaret Avenue PSKitchener31047266%
Howard Robertson PSKitchener33050465%
Bridgeport PSKitchener31050761%
Cedarbrae PSWaterloo24040959%
Hillside PSKitchener28549358%
Prueter PSKitchener21537258%
Floradale PSElmira19534057%
Millen Woods PSWaterloo27549655%
John Darling PSKitchener17532454%
Sandowne PSWaterloo24545853%

One class

A whole school career, start to finish.

In the video I said kids who were in that kindergarten when it was new have now graduated. Here is that class, one school year at a time, beside the addition the board approved before they started.

Junior kindergarten to Grade 12. No addition.

A child who started junior kindergarten in September 2012, the month the addition was due to open, was in senior kindergarten when full-day kindergarten began in the new rooms, and finished Grade 12 in June 2026. By then, staff had screened a rebuild out four times.

  • At Lexington, JK to Grade 6
  • Grades 7 to 12, at other schools
  • Addition not built
  • September 2012: due to open
  • 2013–14: full-day kindergarten begins

Yes board approvesSent to the provinceNo province doesn’t fund itOff the list board drops itOut staff screen it outProposed still listed

Sources: 2010 staff report and 2013 letter to families,⁠[4]⁠[5] 2018 draft plan,⁠[6] four capital priorities reports⁠[9]⁠[10]⁠[11]⁠[12] and the 2025 partnership report.⁠[8] The class is illustrative: a child moving up one grade a year. Each mark sits in the school year of its meeting or letter.

Show this chart as a table
School yearOne classThe 13-classroom additionA rebuild
2009–10—June 21, 2010. Trustees approve a 13-classroom addition in principle, to open in September 2012 if the province funds it.⁠[4]⁠[5]—
2010–11———
2011–12—May 2012. Board staff send it to the Ministry on the board’s list of priority projects.⁠[5]—
2012–13Junior kindergartenSeptember 2012. The addition’s target opening.⁠[5]January 24, 2013. The province funds three other board projects. Lexington’s addition is not one of them.⁠[5]—
2013–14Senior kindergarten. Full-day kindergarten starts at Lexington, in a new three-room addition.⁠[5]Not built. Permanent capacity has stayed at 113 places since 2014–15.⁠[2]⁠[3]—
2014–15Grade 1Not built—
2015–16Grade 2Not built—
2016–17Grade 3Not built—
2017–18Grade 4January 22, 2018. The board’s draft plan says the business case “was never approved by the Ministry and is no longer within the priority list.”⁠[6]—
2018–19Grade 5Not built—
2019–20Grade 6Not built—
2020–21Grade 7Not builtMay 10, 2021. 2021–22 funding round: board staff screen the rebuild out before submission. “Does not meet criteria; ineligible project for 2021/22.”⁠[9]
2021–22Grade 8Not builtFebruary 28, 2022. 2022–23 funding round: board staff screen the rebuild out before submission. “Does not meet criteria; ineligible project for 2022-23.”⁠[10]
2022–23Grade 9Not built—
2023–24Grade 10Not builtOctober 16, 2023. 2023–24 funding round: board staff screen the rebuild out before submission. “Does not meet criteria; ineligible project for 2023-24.”⁠[11]
2024–25Grade 11Not builtSeptember 16, 2024. 2024–25 funding round: board staff screen the rebuild out before submission. “Does not meet criteria; ineligible project for 2024-25.”⁠[12]
2025–26Grade 12Not builtSeptember 15, 2025. A board report still lists the “Proposed Lexington Public School facility rebuild” among its 2020–2025 short-term actions.⁠[8]
2026–27—Not built—

Four rounds

Screened out before it was sent.

Before each provincial funding round, board staff list the projects they considered and didn’t submit. These are board staff’s words, not a decision by the province.

The same line, four rounds running.

Each time, the rebuild was ruled ineligible without naming the requirement it missed. Trustees voted on the submission once, in 2021.

  1. Funding round 2021–22

    Lexington’s row, as printed
    “Does not meet criteria; ineligible project for 2021/22”
    Criterion it failed
    Not named
    Sent to Queen’s Park instead
    4 projects
    Trustee vote
    YesTrustees approved the submission
  2. Funding round 2022–23

    Lexington’s row, as printed
    “Does not meet criteria; ineligible project for 2022-23”
    Criterion it failed
    Not named
    Sent to Queen’s Park instead
    5 projects
    Trustee vote
    NoReport “for the information of the Board”
  3. Funding round 2023–24

    Lexington’s row, as printed
    “Does not meet criteria; ineligible project for 2023-24”
    Criterion it failed
    Not named
    Sent to Queen’s Park instead
    2 projects
    Trustee vote
    NoReport “for the information of the Board”
  4. Funding round 2024–25

    Lexington’s row, as printed
    “Does not meet criteria; ineligible project for 2024-25”
    Criterion it failed
    Not named
    Sent to Queen’s Park instead
    3 projects
    Trustee vote
    NoReport “for the information of the Board”

14 project requests sent to Queen’s Park in four rounds0 for Lexington

Source: Appendix B of each capital priorities report, “Potential Future Capital Priorities Program Submissions.”⁠[9]⁠[10]⁠[11]⁠[12] The same unexplained line appears beside rebuilds or additions at other schools, including Clemens Mill PS and Sunnyside PS.⁠[9]

Show the projects sent instead
RoundProjects sent to the provinceTrustees’ role
2021–22New North Cambridge elementary school; New Breslau-Hopewell Crossing elementary school; Parkway PS addition; Waterloo-Oxford DSS additionTrustees voted to approve the submission.⁠[9]
2022–23New North Cambridge elementary school; Parkway PS addition; Waterloo-Oxford DSS addition; Ayr PS addition; New southwest Kitchener secondary schoolPresented “for the information of the Board”, three days after staff submitted on February 25.⁠[10]
2023–24New North Cambridge elementary school; Parkway PS addition with child carePresented “for the information of the Board”.⁠[11]
2024–25Huron Heights SS addition; New North Cambridge elementary school; New Rosenberg II elementary school with child carePresented “for the information of the Board”.⁠[12]

The full report

The whole paper trail, in one place.

This post covers what the video said. The Lexington report has the rest, with every document linked:

  • Lexington against the top ten in the board and in Ontario
  • Students and permanent places, every year since 2011–12
  • The full history, from 1955 to 2025
  • All four screening lists, row by row
  • The provincial rules, and the nearby-schools question
Read the full report

What I’d do as trustee

Ask in public. Publish the answer.

I’m Brian Best, and I’m running for public school trustee in Waterloo and Wilmot. These are the commitments from the video, sized to what a trustee can actually do.

Move for a public decision

I’d move that trustees decide, in public, whether to submit Lexington in the next provincial funding round.

Ask what it needs to qualify

I’d ask for a staff report on what the project needs to meet the province’s requirements, so families aren’t left guessing which one it fails.

Publish the paper trail

I’d move to publish every capital request, every screening reason and every vote, so parents can see what we asked for and what’s in the way.

A trustee can’t fund a school or promise how a vote will go. Queen’s Park funds construction, and it needs to step up here. A trustee can move the motion, ask for the report and make the answer public.

Transcript

What I said.

The full video, word for word. Captions are burned into the video itself.

Read the transcript · 1:45

This is Lexington Public School. It’s the eighth most overcrowded school in all of Ontario. Now, that’s based on the latest available provincial data comparing enrolment to permanent seat capacity. In 2024–2025, Lexington had 355 students going here, and it only has permanent capacity for 113 seats. That’s more than triple the permanent capacity, the highest ratio in all the school board. It’s ridiculous to see this on a chart. It’s like it’s so far ahead of the next school.

My name is Brian Best. I’m running for school board trustee in Waterloo and Wilmot.

Your board can plan an expansion, but Queen’s Park has the controls to fund it, and sets the requirements in order to qualify for that funding. In 2010, the board approved the 13-classroom addition. In 2013, the province didn’t fund it. Instead, we got a separate kindergarten addition that went ahead. The 13-classroom addition never did. Kids that attended that kindergarten when the addition was new have now graduated from high school.

For four funding rounds, board staff have screened out a rebuild as ineligible under provincial requirements, so it was never submitted. The screening doesn’t list why it didn’t meet the requirements, though.

As a trustee, I’d move for a public decision on submitting Lexington to the next round, and a report explaining what it needs to qualify. I’d move to publish every capital request, screening reason and vote. Parents deserve to see why we’re not getting the things that we need in this region.

Make no mistake, Queen’s Park needs to step up here. This school needs permanent classrooms, not another decade of paperwork.

If you want to read the history of this project, I have a report up on my website, best4schoolboard.com/lexington. That’s best, number four, schoolboard.com/lexington.

Lightly edited from the automatic captions for spelling and punctuation. “Eighth” is on 2020–21 data, the latest year in the province-wide file.⁠[3] “Overcrowded” here means students against permanent capacity, not class size: Lexington’s classes averaged 23.6 students in 2024–⁠25.⁠[7] The kindergarten line holds for the children in senior kindergarten in 2013–14, who finished Grade 12 in June 2026. That year’s junior kindergarten class is in Grade 12 now.

Sources and method

Check my work.

  1. Ontario Ministry of Education, enrolment by school, 2024-25

    October 31 headcount, rounded to the nearest five. Lexington PS is school number 588326.

  2. WRDSB 2020-2030 Long-Term Accommodation Plan

    Review Area E25 on PDF page 100: capacity, portapak, recommendations and forecast. Figure 13 footnote on page 31. Definition of on-the-ground capacity on page 106. Adopted June 21, 2021.

  3. School Utilization in Ontario, Western University

    Ministry School Facility Inventory System records, 2010-11 to 2020-21. Source of the provincial rank and of capacity by year.

  4. Staff report on the East Kitchener-Waterloo accommodation review, June 21, 2010

    School history, the 2009 condition assessment and the recommendation for a 13-classroom addition.

  5. WRDSB letter to the Lexington community, April 30, 2013

    Confirms the 2010 approval in principle, the May 2012 submission, the January 24, 2013 funding announcement and the kindergarten addition.

  6. Draft 2017-2027 Long-Term Accommodation Plan, Committee of the Whole, January 22, 2018

    Review Area E25 history: the business case “was never approved by the Ministry and is no longer within the priority list.”

  7. Community Planning and Facility Partnership Opportunities report, September 15, 2025

    Lists the “Proposed Lexington Public School facility rebuild” under 2020-2025 short-term actions (PDF page 9) and reports the outcome of the 2024 submissions (page 8).

  8. 2021 Capital Priorities Program Submission, May 10, 2021

    Screening list in Appendix B, PDF page 31. Eligibility rules in the body of the report.

  9. 2022-23 Capital Priorities Program Submission, February 28, 2022

    Screening list in Appendix B, PDF page 21. Outcome reported to Committee of the Whole on October 17, 2022.

How the numbers were worked out

  • 314% is 2024–25 enrolment divided by the capacity in the board’s 2020–2030 plan, the newest published. The school is at 314% of its permanent capacity, which is about 214% over it.
  • The board chart covers 120 of 122 schools. Squares are grouped in five-point steps, or ten-point steps on small screens. On a computer, hover over a square to see the school. Every school is also in the table.
  • The Ontario rank uses 2020–21, the last year in the province-wide file. It is a calculation from Ministry data, not a ranking the Ministry publishes.
  • The class in the career chart moves up one grade a year from junior kindergarten in September 2012. Lexington goes to Grade 6, so Grades 7 to 12 are at other schools.

Found a mistake?

If something here is wrong or out of date, email brian@best4schoolboard.com and I will correct it. The full report has the complete history.

Last updated October 10, 2026

Keep watching

More from the campaign.

All videos

More videos are coming

Get the next one in your inbox.